| | | | | | |

Core i9-13980HX vs i9-9900K


Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 2.4 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
906ec
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
545.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
33.62k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
30.02k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
7.17k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
15.43k (x0.96)
TOTAL
116.05k
86.24k (x0.74)

Multithread

i9-13980HX

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
248.93k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
224.43k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
53.39k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
18.54k (x0.65)
TOTAL
1317.53k
545.3k (x0.41)

Performance/W
i9-13980HX
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4