Core i9-13980HX vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 7.6 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13980HX gets a score of 1317.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 7.6 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048+16x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
116.05k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1317.53k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13980HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.07k
14.63k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
30.22k
24.09k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.67k
5.51k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.09k
15.86k (x0.99)
TOTAL
116.05k
60.09k (x0.52)
Multithread
i9-13980HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
597.18k
48.75k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
466.55k
80.1k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.13k
24.5k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.67k
19.85k (x0.69)
TOTAL
1317.53k
173.2k (x0.13)
Performance/W
i9-13980HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10858 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8483 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4093 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
521 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
23955 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13980HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9655 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5396 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2798 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2874 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
20723 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4