Core i9-13900HX vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 6.7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-13900HX gets a score of 1160.7 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 6.7 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
112.85k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1160.72k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-13900HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
53.69k
14.63k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
28.76k
24.09k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.93k
5.51k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.47k
15.86k (x1.03)
TOTAL
112.85k
60.09k (x0.53)
Multithread
i9-13900HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
526.44k
48.75k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
420.48k
80.1k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
196.13k
24.5k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.68k
19.85k (x1.12)
TOTAL
1160.72k
173.2k (x0.15)
Performance/W
i9-13900HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9572 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7645 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3566 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
321 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
21104 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-13900HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9942 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2765 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2865 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
20898 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4