Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 6.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-13700HX gets a score of 1070.4 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 6.2 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f2
800f11
Core
Raptor Lake-HX
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1964
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/24
6/12
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/2x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
109.41k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
1070.39k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-13700HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.57k
14.63k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
28.78k
24.09k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
5.51k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.46k
15.86k (x0.96)
TOTAL
109.41k
60.09k (x0.55)
Multithread
i7-13700HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
486.01k
48.75k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
386.1k
80.1k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
173.21k
24.5k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.08k
19.85k (x0.79)
TOTAL
1070.39k
173.2k (x0.16)
Performance/W
i7-13700HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
8836 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7020 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3149 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
456 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
19462 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-13700HX
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
9715 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3120 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3293 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
21882 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4