| | | | | | |

Core i3-13100F vs i7-9700K


Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.2 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b06f5
906ec
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
58 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
460.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
29.3k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
25.61k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
5.86k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
12.86k (x0.87)
TOTAL
100.94k
73.62k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-13100F

i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
217.77k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
190.46k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
40.48k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
11.31k (x0.74)
TOTAL
390.23k
460.02k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i3-13100F
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
4842 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4