Core i3-13100F vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-13100F gets a score of 390.2 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06f5
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
58 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
100.94k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.23k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-13100F
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.14k
16.21k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
25.77k
22.99k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.25k
8.76k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
21.94k (x1.48)
TOTAL
100.94k
69.9k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-13100F
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
168.51k
121.94k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
142.8k
153.22k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.57k
67.74k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.34k
33.31k (x2.17)
TOTAL
390.23k
376.22k (x0.96)
Performance/W
i3-13100F
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2905 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2462 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1096 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
6728 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-13100F
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10476 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5728 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2945 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3283 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
22432 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4