| | | | | | |

Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12500H gets a score of 225.7 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a3
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280/2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
58.37k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
225.65k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.11k
13.95k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.61k
22.02k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.53k
5.17k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.72k
16.61k (x2.15)
TOTAL
57.97k
57.75k (x1)

Multithread

i5-12500H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
61.44k
120.59k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
93.66k
197.34k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.09k
56.83k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.01k
6.41k (x1.07)
TOTAL
201.2k
381.16k (x1.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
22.61k
12.65k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
17.73k
20.95k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.63k
4.63k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
14.47k (x1.72)
TOTAL
58.37k
52.69k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12500H

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
85.49k
101.78k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
94.93k
177.57k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.15k
47.18k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.78k (x1.12)
TOTAL
225.65k
333.31k (x1.48)

Performance/W
i5-12500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2110 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
870 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
135 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5014 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12500H
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
5025 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3939 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2139 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1867 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
12971 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4