| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 399.4 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
117 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280+0x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
76.46k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
399.39k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400F
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
13.95k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
22.02k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.95k
5.17k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
16.61k (x1.15)
TOTAL
77.41k
57.75k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-12400F

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
126.87k
120.59k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
186.48k
197.34k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92.37k
56.83k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.45k
6.41k (x0.41)
TOTAL
421.18k
381.16k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
33.85k
12.65k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
20.33k
20.95k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
4.63k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.77k
14.47k (x1.23)
TOTAL
76.46k
52.69k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-12400F

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
174.21k
101.78k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
141.31k
177.57k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
47.18k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.01k
6.78k (x0.36)
TOTAL
399.39k
333.31k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i5-12400F
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
554 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3414 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
7693 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4621 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2389 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2675 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4