| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
906ec
Core
Arder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
5.17k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
21.15k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
7.01k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
15.32k (x1.04)
TOTAL
54.29k
48.66k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-12400

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
38.45k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
155.68k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
51k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
18.26k (x0.84)
TOTAL
281.22k
263.38k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
33.62k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
30.02k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
7.17k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
15.43k (x1.04)
TOTAL
102.51k
86.24k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-12400

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
248.93k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
224.43k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
53.39k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
18.54k (x0.86)
TOTAL
544.64k
545.3k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4