| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i5-9500T


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
3.73k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
15.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
4.62k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
10.59k (x0.8)
TOTAL
51.61k
34.35k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
20.82k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
85.48k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
23.21k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
4.11k (x0.82)
TOTAL
172.07k
133.63k (x0.78)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
12.4k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
18.41k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
4.69k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
10.48k (x0.79)
TOTAL
74.99k
45.98k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
74.86k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
105.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
22.34k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
4.01k (x0.68)
TOTAL
288.36k
207.08k (x0.72)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
13.46k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
20.21k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
4.72k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
10.25k (x0.85)
TOTAL
73.15k
48.64k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
74.65k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
110.86k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
22.08k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
4.12k (x0.71)
TOTAL
301.58k
211.7k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
24.5k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
21.41k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.82k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
10.73k (x0.93)
TOTAL
81.64k
61.46k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
134.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
113.61k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
21.71k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
4.07k (x0.64)
TOTAL
297.46k
274.02k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4