| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
13.95k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
22.02k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
5.17k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
16.61k (x1.37)
TOTAL
73.15k
57.75k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-1235U

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
120.59k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
197.34k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
56.83k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
6.41k (x1.11)
TOTAL
301.58k
381.16k (x1.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
12.65k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
20.95k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.63k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
14.47k (x1.25)
TOTAL
81.64k
52.69k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-1235U

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
101.78k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
177.57k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
47.18k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.78k (x1.07)
TOTAL
297.46k
333.31k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4