| | | | | | |

Core i3-1215U vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1215U gets a score of 185.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f11
Core
Alder Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
0.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280+2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
80.34k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.6k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1215U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
13.95k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.2k
22.02k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.94k
5.17k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
16.61k (x2.06)
TOTAL
53.83k
57.75k (x1.07)

Multithread

i3-1215U

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
35.72k
120.59k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
56.41k
197.34k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25k
56.83k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.48k
6.41k (x0.51)
TOTAL
129.6k
381.16k (x2.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1215U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
37.56k
12.65k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
21.13k
20.95k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.35k
4.63k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.31k
14.47k (x1.4)
TOTAL
80.34k
52.69k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-1215U

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
73.97k
101.78k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
72.37k
177.57k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.61k
47.18k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.65k
6.78k (x0.7)
TOTAL
185.6k
333.31k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i3-1215U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
4931 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4825 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
643 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
12374 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1215U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
8535 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4802 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2579 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2343 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
18258 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4