| | | | | | |

Core i3-12100T vs i5-9500T


Description
The i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-12100T gets a score of 330.6 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90675
906ea
Core
Alder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
93.54k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
330.62k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.88k
3.73k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
15.41k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.26k
4.62k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.49k
10.59k (x0.79)
TOTAL
49.98k
34.35k (x0.69)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.03k
20.82k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
84.16k
85.48k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
46.49k
23.21k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.96k
4.11k (x0.46)
TOTAL
161.65k
133.63k (x0.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.39k
12.4k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
22.29k
18.41k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.37k
4.69k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.72k
10.48k (x0.76)
TOTAL
71.76k
45.98k (x0.64)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
76.69k
74.86k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
104.06k
105.88k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
22.34k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
4.01k (x0.45)
TOTAL
242.81k
207.08k (x0.85)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.25k
13.46k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
20.21k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.09k
4.72k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.21k
10.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
71.7k
48.64k (x0.68)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
77.43k
74.65k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
109.08k
110.86k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
52.45k
22.08k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
4.12k (x0.47)
TOTAL
247.71k
211.7k (x0.85)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
43.24k
24.5k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.76k
21.41k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.67k
4.82k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.88k
10.73k (x0.77)
TOTAL
93.54k
61.46k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-12100T

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
150.28k
134.63k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
126.29k
113.61k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.32k
21.71k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
4.07k (x0.47)
TOTAL
330.62k
274.02k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4294 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3608 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1295 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
9446 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-12100T
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
10546 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5794 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3089 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3384 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
22814 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4