Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.7 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.7 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
800f11
Core
Arder Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
99.72k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
552.59k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
46.08k
12.65k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
25.51k
20.95k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.4k
4.63k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.73k
14.47k (x0.98)
TOTAL
99.72k
52.69k (x0.53)
Multithread
i5-12400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
237.35k
101.78k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
201.2k
177.57k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.8k
47.18k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.24k
6.78k (x0.42)
TOTAL
552.59k
333.31k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i5-12400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3095 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1505 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8501 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
10472 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5798 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3046 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3348 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
22665 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4