| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 263.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3.9 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
906ec
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
5.17k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
21.15k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
7.01k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
15.32k (x2.53)
TOTAL
31.39k
48.66k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-11400T

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
38.45k (x5.2)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
155.68k (x4.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
51k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
18.26k (x1.78)
TOTAL
67.1k
263.38k (x3.93)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1639 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
537 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
192 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
2772 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
4230 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1402 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
3065 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
9731 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4