| | | | | | |

Core i5-1135G7 vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1135G7 gets a score of 237.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f11
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.08k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
237.55k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1135G7
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
3.95k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.28k
18.36k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.5k
5.39k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.81k
17.35k (x1.97)
TOTAL
39.34k
45.06k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.43k
19.47k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
54.95k
77.19k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.41k
15.4k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.38k
12.25k (x1.66)
TOTAL
101.16k
124.3k (x1.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1135G7
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.91k
14.63k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.39k
24.09k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
5.51k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.7k
15.86k (x1.82)
TOTAL
68.08k
60.09k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1135G7

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.51k
48.75k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
99.21k
80.1k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.35k
24.5k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.47k
19.85k (x1.9)
TOTAL
237.55k
173.2k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-1135G7
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3375 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3543 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1191 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
374 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
8484 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1135G7
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6169 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5569 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2401 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2071 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16210 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4