Core i3-1115G4 vs i7-4790
Description
The i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1115G4 gets a score of 138 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
28 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
62.19k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.96k points
173.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3.75k
4.51k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.22k
11.24k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.79k
5.03k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.02k (x0.61)
TOTAL
38.97k
25.8k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
9.19k
15.72k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
35.47k
54.99k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.14k
23.87k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.82k
5.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
69.62k
100.06k (x1.44)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
12.9k
13.52k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
21.4k
11.94k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.73k
4.96k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
4.84k (x0.59)
TOTAL
53.19k
35.25k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
30.31k
54.7k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
45.13k
52.41k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.17k
24.5k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
6.77k (x1.17)
TOTAL
101.38k
138.37k (x1.36)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
14.65k
14.07k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.57k
12.63k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
5.35k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
4.98k (x0.62)
TOTAL
54.18k
37.03k (x0.68)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
32.14k
57.88k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
43.54k
60.83k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.58k
24.4k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.61k
6.95k (x1.24)
TOTAL
100.87k
150.07k (x1.49)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
24.25k
22.19k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.63k
12.45k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.09k
5.11k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.23k
4.98k (x0.69)
TOTAL
62.19k
44.73k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
56.9k
87.14k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
55.68k
58k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.29k
22.75k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.09k
6k (x0.99)
TOTAL
137.96k
173.89k (x1.26)
Performance/W
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
2032 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1989 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
217 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4927 points/W
2070 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1115G4
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
5914 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5275 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1764 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
15169 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4