Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
16.21k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
22.99k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
8.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
21.94k (x2.16)
TOTAL
76.93k
69.9k (x0.91)
Multithread
i7-11370H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
121.94k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
153.22k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
67.74k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
33.31k (x4.95)
TOTAL
295.92k
376.22k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4