Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f11
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
333.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
12.65k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
20.95k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
4.63k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
14.47k (x1.96)
TOTAL
56.25k
52.69k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
101.78k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
177.57k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
47.18k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
6.78k (x2.23)
TOTAL
241.03k
333.31k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4