Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
16.21k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
22.99k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
8.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
21.94k (x2.98)
TOTAL
56.25k
69.9k (x1.24)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
121.94k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
153.22k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
67.74k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
33.31k (x10.93)
TOTAL
241.03k
376.22k (x1.56)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4