| | | | | | |

Result in mode FPU

Submitted by cobito


September 14th 2020 at 21:44

from Windows 10 (20H1 - 2004) [10.0.19041.508]
 
Monothread
Multithread [4 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1706 points
6575 points (x 3.9)
Test#2 (FP)
5293 points
20238 points (x 3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2764 points
10427 points (x 3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3428 points
4997 points (x 1.5)
TOTAL
13191 points
42237 points (x 3.2)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2525 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 CPU @ 1.50GHz
CPUID
706a1
Core
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
TDP
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
          
Motherboard

Testing details
BIOS brand
American Megatrends Inc.
BIOS version
P1.40 [08/06/2018]

Specs
Official name
ASRock J4105-ITX
Revision
Chipset
Intel J4105
Socket
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Kingston HyperX (8192 MB)
Slot#1
Kingston HyperX (8192 MB)
Total RAM
16 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
2133 MHz
Type
DDR4
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Kingston HyperX
P/N
KHX3200C20S4/8G
Official brand
Kingston
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
3200 MHz
Size
8192 MB per module
Module
PC4-25600
Timings
16
Kit
2 x 8192 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
616.mdigerat
Intel Core i5-520M
15941
617.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
618.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
619.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
620.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
621.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
622.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
623.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
624.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
625.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774
626.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
14659
627.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
14649
628.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
14270
629.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
630.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
631.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
632.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
633.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
634.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
635.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468
636.cobito
Intel Celeron J4105
13191
This one
637.cobito
Intel Pentium E5200 (R0)
13085
638.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
13078
639.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
12984
640.*
Intel Celeron E3300
12963
641.krampak
Intel Xeon E5606
12925
642.*
Intel Pentium P6200
12738
643.carmen_TM
Intel Core i7-720QM
12680
644.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
12103
645.*
AMD A6 3600
12015
646.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
11626
647.*
AMD A4 3310MX
11401
648.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
11337
649.krampak
Intel Xeon E5504
11201
650.*
AMD A6 7310
11170
651.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
11151
652.*
Intel Pentium N3540
11127
653.*
Intel Core i5-450M
11094
654.NakedCOOL
AMD Athlon II 170u
11027
655.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
10903
656.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
10805

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
569.*
Intel Pentium Gold 5405U
48829
570.*
Intel Core i5-2540M
48617
571.*
Intel Celeron G3900TE
48133
572.Namiga
Intel Core i3-5005U
47892
573.*
AMD A9 9425
47467
574.Yorus
Intel Celeron J3455
47337
575.Namiga
AMD A9 9420
46335
576.*
Intel Core i5-3317U
46312
577.krampak
Intel Core i3-4030U
46093
578.TinMan
AMD A9 9425
45993
579.krampak
Intel Core i5-3317U
45226
580.*
AMD FX 4100
44306
581.*
AMD A6 3600
44124
582.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
43980
583.*
Intel Core i5-2450M
43440
584.*
Intel Core i3-3110M
42851
585.*
Intel Core i5-650
42713
586.maria jesus cobo
AMD A9 9425
42644
587.krampak
Intel Xeon E5504
42583
588.krampak
Intel Pentium G2020
42392
589.cobito
Intel Celeron J4105
42237
This one
590.krampak
Intel Core i3-550
41495
591.*
Intel Pentium 4417U
41147
592.*
Intel Core i5-2430M
40763
593.*
Intel Celeron N4100
40572
594.carmen_TM
Intel Core i7-720QM
39984
595.*
Intel Pentium N3540
39668
596.Namiga
Intel Celeron N3450
39332
597.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
38924
598.kynes
Intel Celeron G1610T
38889
599.*
Intel Core i3-540
38858
600.*
Intel Core i3-2330M
38806
601.krampak
Intel Core i5-2410M
38683
602.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
37884
603.*
Intel Core i3-550
37781
604.*
Intel Celeron 4205U
37612
605.*
AMD A10 5745M
37110
606.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
37000
607.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
36484
608.*
AMD A6 3500
36015
609.*
AMD A6 7310
35868

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4