| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by Namiga


March 27th 2018 at 17:06

from Windows 10 (Redstone 1 - 1607) [10.0.14393]
 
Monothread
Multithread [6 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
6666 points
34880 points (x 5.2)
Test#2 (FP)
4521 points
24328 points (x 5.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2458 points
14519 points (x 5.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2367 points
3700 points (x 1.6)
TOTAL
16012 points
77427 points (x 4.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2827 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
CPUID
206c2
Core
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6 /6
TDP
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
Release date
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.96k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
HP
BIOS version
P67 [12/02/2012]

Specs
Official name
HP ProLiant DL380 G7 Not Specified
Motherboard
Architecture
Socket
LGA 1366
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#2
Slot#5
Total RAM
8 GB
Bus width
72 bits
Frequency
1333 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slots 2, 5: Kingston KVR1333D3N9/4G
P/N
99U5471-012.A00LF
Official brand
Kingston
Type
Form factor
DIMM
Stock frequency
1333 MHz
Size
4096 MB per module
Module
PC3-10600
Voltage
1,5 V
Kit
1 x 4096 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
605.jordiqui
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2
17794
606.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
17401
607.garfield
Intel Core i5-2467M
17306
608.*
Intel Pentium N5000
17270
609.*
Intel Celeron N4100
17214
610.Namiga
Intel Core i7-640LM
17195
611.*
AMD Athlon II X2 260
17135
612.*
AMD A10 5745M
17077
613.krampak
Intel Core i7-930
17072
614.*
Intel Core i3-2330M
17005
615.desvest
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
16799
616.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
16780
617.*
Intel Core i5-520M
16719
618.cobito
Intel Xeon E5472
16663
619.*
Intel Xeon E5472
16592
620.*
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
16526
621.*
Intel Core i5-460 M
16316
622.Namiga
Intel Core i3-3217U
16147
623.*
Intel Pentium E6600
16142
624.*
Intel Core i3-3217U
16043
625.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
16012
This one
626.*
Intel Core i5-520M
15928
627.Namiga
Intel Xeon X3430
15839
628.cobito
Intel Core i7-720QM
15819
629.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
15636
630.Yorus
Intel Xeon L5430
15624
631.hAyO
Intel Pentium E5500
15352
632.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
15062
633.*
Intel Core i5-M 540
15045
634.hAyO
Intel Core i5-450M
14774
635.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
14659
636.*
Intel Core i5-3437U
14649
637.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
14270
638.Calbertoem
Intel Core i7-870
14270
639.cobito
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5400
14052
640.krampak
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
14035
641.*
AMD A6 3500
13982
642.*
Intel Core i3-370M
13922
643.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
13802
644.stefanhandberg73
AMD A6 3500
13646
645.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
13468

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
472.*
Intel N100
88290
473.krampak
Intel Core i5-2400
87148
474.*
Intel Core i5-2500
86858
475.*
Intel Core i5-6200U
86055
476.*
Intel Core i5-2400
85390
477.*
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
84501
478.cobito
Intel Core i7-5500U
82714
479.*
AMD FX 6300
82590
480.Namiga
Intel Core i3-7100U
81511
481.Nemo
Intel Core i5-7200U
80893
482._Neptunno_
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
80619
483.*
Intel Core i7-950
80367
484.*
Virtual Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
79763
485.*
Intel Core i5-2320
79640
486.krampak
Intel Core i5-2300
79462
487.Yorus
Intel Core i7-4600U
79220
488.*
Intel Core i3-6100U
79145
489.*
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
79108
490.krampak
Intel Core i7-7020U
78351
491.*
Intel Core i3-7100U
78010
492.Namiga
Intel Xeon E5645
77427
This one
493.*
Intel Core i5-5300U
76710
494.*
Intel Core i5-4278U
76177
495.*
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
76036
496.Nemo
Intel Core i7-860
75649
497.krampak
Intel Core i7-860
75202
498.*
Intel Core i3-8145U
75127
499.*
Intel Core i7-930
75031
500.Namiga
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
74894
501.*
Intel Core i5-5200U
74636
502.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
74229
503.hAyO
Intel Core i3-4160
73999
504.Namiga
Intel Xeon W3530
73355
505.*
Intel Xeon W3530
73272
506.krampak
Intel Xeon W3550
73215
507.*
Intel Xeon W3520
73161
508._Neptunno_
Intel Core i7-950
72206
509.*
AMD FX 8120
70775
510.*
Intel Celeron N5105
70610
511.TinMan
Intel Core i7-4500U
70323
512.krampak
Intel Core i3-6006U
69907

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4