ARM M1 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The M1 is based on - architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M1 gets a score of 142.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M1 gets a score of 142.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.3 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
406f1
Core
-
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
-
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
- W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
20480 kB
Date
January 1900
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
41.44k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.32k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M1
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.46k
8.22k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
12.06k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
4.01k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
2.89k (x0.76)
TOTAL
41.44k
27.18k (x0.66)
Multithread
M1
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.73k
61.34k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
87.52k
90.21k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
26.2k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
4.62k (x0.73)
TOTAL
142.32k
182.37k (x1.28)
Performance/W
M1
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)