Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Xeon W3520
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.1 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
106a5
Core
-
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/8
4 /8
TDP
- W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
8192 kB
Date
-
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
7.35k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
4.89k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.9k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
2.82k (x0.54)
TOTAL
21.22k
17.96k (x0.85)
Multithread
2,84GHz
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
29.69k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
22.26k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
14.91k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.29k (x0.94)
TOTAL
79.76k
73.16k (x0.92)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)