Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Core 2 Quad Q9550
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 1.6 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
1067a
Core
-
Yorkfield
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
- W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
- kB
12288 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
-
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
48.98k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
3.28k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
7.28k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.83k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
3.9k (x0.74)
TOTAL
21.22k
17.29k (x0.81)
Multithread
2,84GHz
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
11.72k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
24.91k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
9.77k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.57k (x0.38)
TOTAL
79.76k
48.98k (x0.61)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)