Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Celeron N4020
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 3.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 3.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
706a8
Core
-
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
- W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
-
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
5.14k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
7.89k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.87k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
1.76k (x0.34)
TOTAL
21.22k
17.67k (x0.83)
Multithread
2,84GHz
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
7.46k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
11.61k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
4.27k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
1.91k (x0.29)
TOTAL
79.76k
25.26k (x0.32)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)