Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Celeron N3150
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.5 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.5 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
406c3
Core
-
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
-
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
- W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
kB
Date
-
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
3.91k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
2.29k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
1.57k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
1.44k (x0.28)
TOTAL
21.22k
9.21k (x0.43)
Multithread
2,84GHz
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
14.78k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
8.62k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
5.84k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.57k (x0.38)
TOTAL
79.76k
31.8k (x0.4)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)