Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Celeron N3060
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 6 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 6 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
406c4
Core
-
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
- W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
-
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
4.68k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
2.74k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
1.83k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
0.9k (x0.17)
TOTAL
21.22k
10.15k (x0.48)
Multithread
2,84GHz
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
6.31k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
3.68k (x0.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
2.46k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
0.91k (x0.14)
TOTAL
79.76k
13.36k (x0.17)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)