Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Celeron J1900
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
30679
Core
-
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
- W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
-
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
4.58k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
2.32k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
1.72k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
1.14k (x0.22)
TOTAL
21.22k
9.75k (x0.46)
Multithread
2,84GHz
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
17.16k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
8.42k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
6.22k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
1.44k (x0.22)
TOTAL
79.76k
33.25k (x0.42)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)