Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
810f81
Core
-
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
-
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
-
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
168.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
14.3k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
21.69k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
5.42k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
6.6k (x1.26)
TOTAL
21.22k
48k (x2.26)
Multithread
2,84GHz
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
55.45k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
83.13k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
20.76k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
6.58k (x0.98)
TOTAL
79.76k
165.91k (x2.08)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)