Virtual CPU 2,84GHz vs Celeron N5095
Description
The 2,84GHz is based on - architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2,84GHz gets a score of 79.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.2 times faster than the 2,84GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
906c0
Core
-
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.84 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.84 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
-
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
kB
Cache L2
- kB
kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
-
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
21.22k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.76k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2,84GHz
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
4.27k
10.08k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
8.93k
10.11k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
4.06k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.23k
2.36k (x0.45)
TOTAL
21.22k
26.6k (x1.25)
Multithread
2,84GHz
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
19.35k
36.86k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
40.57k
38.51k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.15k
15.17k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
2.72k (x0.41)
TOTAL
79.76k
93.26k (x1.17)
Performance/W
2,84GHz
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)