Virtual CPU Version 2.5 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The Version 2.5 is based on - architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Version 2.5 gets a score of 85.7 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Version 2.5 gets a score of 85.7 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
663
906c0
Core
-
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
-
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
kB
Cache L2
- kB
kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
-
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
85.75k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Version 2.5
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
15.7k
10.08k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
10.11k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.61k
4.06k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
2.36k (x0.2)
TOTAL
56.16k
26.6k (x0.47)
Multithread
Version 2.5
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
28.49k
36.86k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
37.67k
38.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
15.17k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.5k
2.72k (x0.29)
TOTAL
85.75k
93.26k (x1.09)
Performance/W
Version 2.5
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)