Virtual CPU Version 2.5 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The Version 2.5 is based on - architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Version 2.5 gets a score of 85.7 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.9 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Version 2.5 gets a score of 85.7 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.9 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
663
810f81
Core
-
Picasso
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
-
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
-
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.16k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
85.75k points
168.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Version 2.5
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.7k
14.3k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.8k
21.69k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.61k
5.42k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
6.6k (x0.55)
TOTAL
56.16k
48k (x0.85)
Multithread
Version 2.5
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.49k
55.45k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
37.67k
83.13k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.09k
20.76k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.5k
6.58k (x0.69)
TOTAL
85.75k
165.91k (x1.93)
Performance/W
Version 2.5
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)