Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Core 2 Duo T6400
Description
Both models T4500 and T6400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the T6400 gets 17.1 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the T6400 gets 17.1 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
FC-PGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2010
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
12.06k points
10.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.71k points
17.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.76k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
4.63k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
1.86k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.21k
1k (x0.82)
TOTAL
10.96k
9.24k (x0.84)
Multithread
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.11k
3.21k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
10.61k
8.75k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.47k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
1.14k (x0.86)
TOTAL
20.52k
16.58k (x0.81)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.64k
2.26k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
4.98k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
1.89k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
0.96k (x0.8)
TOTAL
12.06k
10.08k (x0.84)
Multithread
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.21k
4.06k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
11.52k
8.53k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
3.38k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
1.11k (x0.83)
TOTAL
22.71k
17.08k (x0.75)
Performance/W
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
149 points/W
116 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
329 points/W
244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
649 points/W
488 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1147 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2555 points/GHz
2491 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
517 points/GHz
478 points/GHz
TOTAL
5245 points/GHz
5040 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4