Pentium Dual-Core T4500 vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The T4500 is based on Core architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T4500 gets a score of 22.7 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
306a9
Core
Penryn-3M
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2010
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
12.06k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.71k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T4500
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.64k
6.66k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
5.88k
6.88k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.68k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.19k
2.6k (x2.19)
TOTAL
12.06k
18.83k (x1.56)
Multithread
T4500
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.21k
16.56k (x3.18)
Test#2 (FP)
11.52k
11.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
7.28k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.33k
2.25k (x1.69)
TOTAL
22.71k
37.78k (x1.66)
Performance/W
T4500
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
149 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
329 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
649 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
T4500
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
1147 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2555 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
517 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5245 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4