Pentium E6600 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 11.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 29.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 11.1 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
306f2
Core
Wolfdale
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2010
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
16.14k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.4k points
452.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.57k
11.08k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
7.85k
9.57k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
3.18k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.58k
3.28k (x2.07)
TOTAL
16.14k
27.11k (x1.68)
Multithread
E6600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6.99k
139.07k (x19.89)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
133.47k (x9.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
46.6k (x7.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.66k
6.65k (x4.01)
TOTAL
29.4k
325.78k (x11.08)
Performance/W
E6600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
108 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
26 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
452 points/W
2715 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1163 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2561 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1023 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
5263 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4