| | | | | | |

Pentium E6600 vs 4415U


Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.9 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
806e9
Core
Wolfdale
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2010
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.14k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.4k points
56.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.57k
8.29k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
7.85k
11.82k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
3.09k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.58k
4.18k (x2.64)
TOTAL
16.14k
27.39k (x1.7)

Multithread

E6600

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.99k
17.24k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
27.4k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
7.44k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.66k
4.31k (x2.6)
TOTAL
29.4k
56.39k (x1.92)

Performance/W
E6600
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
108 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
26 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
452 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
E6600
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1163 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2561 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1023 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
5263 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4