Pentium E6600 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The E6600 is based on Core architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 29.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.3 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E6600 gets a score of 29.4 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.3 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
306a9
Core
Wolfdale
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2010
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
16.14k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.4k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E6600
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.57k
7.87k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
7.85k
7.14k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
3.04k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.58k
2.79k (x1.76)
TOTAL
16.14k
20.84k (x1.29)
Multithread
E6600
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.99k
15.12k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
14.05k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
5.94k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.66k
3.48k (x2.1)
TOTAL
29.4k
38.59k (x1.31)
Performance/W
E6600
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
108 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
26 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
452 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
E6600
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1163 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2561 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1023 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
516 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
5263 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4