Pentium E5500 vs Core i5-2410M
Description
The E5500 is based on Core architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the i5-2410M gets 31.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.5 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the i5-2410M gets 31.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.5 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
206a7
Core
Wolfdale
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2010
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.77k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.69k points
38.68k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5500
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
2.38k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
6.6k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
3.48k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
3.16k (x3.47)
TOTAL
12.77k
15.62k (x1.22)
Multithread
E5500
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
5.49k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.8k
14.39k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.7k
8.39k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
3.09k (x3.53)
TOTAL
20.69k
31.35k (x1.52)
Performance/W
E5500
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
157 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
240 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
13 points/W
88 points/W
TOTAL
318 points/W
896 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5500
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2335 points/GHz
2277 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
1200 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
1090 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
5386 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4