Pentium E5500 vs Celeron 3855U
Description
The E5500 is based on Core architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the 3855U gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5500 gets a score of 20.7 k points while the 3855U gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
406e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2096 kB
Date
April 2010
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
12.77k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.69k points
24.56k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5500
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.56k
1.64k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
6.72k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
2.06k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.4k (x2.64)
TOTAL
12.77k
12.83k (x1)
Multithread
E5500
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.32k
2.2k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
10.8k
9.59k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.7k
2.76k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
2.27k (x2.6)
TOTAL
20.69k
16.81k (x0.81)
Performance/W
E5500
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
66 points/W
146 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
639 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72 points/W
184 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
13 points/W
151 points/W
TOTAL
318 points/W
1121 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5500
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2335 points/GHz
4201 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
985 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
1502 points/GHz
TOTAL
4560 points/GHz
8020 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4