Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Xeon X5675
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 5.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 5.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
206c2
Core
Wolfdale
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2008
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
8.77k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
5.82k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
3.47k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
2.98k (x2.21)
TOTAL
13.08k
21.04k (x1.61)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
53.23k (x9.76)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
39.35k (x3.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
27.05k (x6.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
5.28k (x5.04)
TOTAL
22.02k
124.92k (x5.67)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4