Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Xeon X5670
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 5.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 5.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
206c2
Core
Wolfdale
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2008
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
8.35k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
5.58k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
3.32k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
3k (x2.23)
TOTAL
13.08k
20.26k (x1.55)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
49.72k (x9.12)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
35.19k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
21.88k (x5.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
8.6k (x8.2)
TOTAL
22.02k
115.4k (x5.24)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4