Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Xeon E5-4640
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 26.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 26.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
206d7
Core
Wolfdale
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
8 /16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2008
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
610.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
6.19k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
5.89k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.11k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
2.51k (x1.86)
TOTAL
13.08k
16.7k (x1.28)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
244.88k (x44.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
215.35k (x18.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
114.64k (x28.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
6.76k (x6.44)
TOTAL
22.02k
581.63k (x26.41)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
2267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
1207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
6122 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
2210 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
2105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
5966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4