Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
Both models E5200 (M0) and Q6700 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.1 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.1 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
6fb
Core
Wolfdale
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2008
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
3.06k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
2.74k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.56k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.68k (x1.25)
TOTAL
13.08k
10.05k (x0.77)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
7.28k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
5.83k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
5.13k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.53k (x1.46)
TOTAL
22.02k
19.77k (x0.9)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4