Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core i5-M 540
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the i5-M 540 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i5-M 540 gets 29.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-M 540 is 1.3 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i5-M 540 gets 29.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-M 540 is 1.3 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
20652
Core
Wolfdale
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
FC-PGA10
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
15.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
29.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
6.7k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
4.54k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.48k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
13.08k
15.05k (x1.15)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
12.27k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
9.7k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
5.97k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.59k (x1.52)
TOTAL
22.02k
29.54k (x1.34)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
351 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
171 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
2394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
473 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
5373 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4