Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Core i5-460 M
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the i5-460 M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i5-460 M gets 33.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1.5 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the i5-460 M gets 33.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1.5 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
20655
Core
Wolfdale
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
16.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
33.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
6.85k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
4.64k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.72k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
2.1k (x1.56)
TOTAL
13.08k
16.32k (x1.25)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
13.71k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
10.68k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
6.65k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
2.65k (x2.53)
TOTAL
22.02k
33.69k (x1.53)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
305 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
190 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
i5-460 M
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1658 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
751 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4