Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Celeron N4020
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
706a8
Core
Wolfdale
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2008
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
5.14k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
7.89k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
2.87k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
1.76k (x1.31)
TOTAL
13.08k
17.67k (x1.35)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
7.46k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
11.61k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
4.27k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1.91k (x1.82)
TOTAL
22.02k
25.26k (x1.15)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4