Pentium E5200 (M0) vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Description
The E5200 (M0) is based on Core architecture while the TK-42 is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.7 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5200 (M0) gets a score of 22 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.7 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
60f82
Core
Wolfdale
Tyler
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket S1g1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
20 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2008
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.08k points
6.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.02k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5200 (M0)
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
1.06k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
2.91k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.53k
1.43k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.35k
0.89k (x0.66)
TOTAL
13.08k
6.28k (x0.48)
Multithread
E5200 (M0)
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
5.45k
4.02k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
5.2k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.02k
2.68k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.05k
1k (x0.95)
TOTAL
22.02k
12.91k (x0.59)
Performance/W
E5200 (M0)
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
84 points/W
201 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
177 points/W
260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
339 points/W
645 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5200 (M0)
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
1154 points/GHz
662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2526 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1013 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
555 points/GHz
TOTAL
5231 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4