| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.4 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a0652
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
4.69k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
18.71k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.84k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
13.95k (x1.7)
TOTAL
31.45k
43.19k (x1.37)

Multithread

W-2223

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
18.79k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
86.1k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
27.42k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
5.27k (x0.77)
TOTAL
104.51k
137.58k (x1.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
29.06k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
26.49k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
6.23k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
13.89k (x1.59)
TOTAL
59.68k
75.67k (x1.27)

Multithread

W-2223

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
154.61k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
151.34k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
36.33k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
6.93k (x1.01)
TOTAL
243.18k
349.21k (x1.44)

Performance/W
W-2223
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4