| | | | | | |

Xeon W-2223 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the W-2223 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Glacier Falls
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8448 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.68k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W-2223
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.97k
4.26k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
14.5k
15.48k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4.94k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.19k
4.31k (x0.53)
TOTAL
31.45k
28.98k (x0.92)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.56k
7.41k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
59.23k
29.18k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.87k
10.26k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
3.27k (x0.48)
TOTAL
104.51k
50.13k (x0.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
W-2223
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.09k
24.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.76k
22.32k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
5.02k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
4.7k (x0.54)
TOTAL
59.68k
56.64k (x0.95)

Multithread

W-2223

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
111.43k
47.98k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
100.2k
44.28k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.67k
10.33k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.89k
3.98k (x0.58)
TOTAL
243.18k
106.58k (x0.44)

Performance/W
W-2223
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
929 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
206 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
2027 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
W-2223
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6432 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5324 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1301 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2247 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
15303 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4